Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Litke

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

This is a motion by the owner of the equity, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, for a stay pursuant to the provisions of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 501 et seq.).

The soldier owner, at the time of Ms induction into the service, was earning sixty dollars per week. He is now earning fifty dollars per month, and his father, seventy-three years old and dependent upon Mm for support, receives an Army allotment of tMrty-seven dollars per month.

*298Upon the facts disclosed by the papers before me, the motion will be granted on…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. LitkeNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brown Service Ins. Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API