Legal Opinion

Deno v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2005No. 2004-SC-000233-MRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice LAMBERT.

Appellant, James Anthony Deno, was indicted by a Jessamine county grand jury for rape in the first degree and for failing to register as a sex offender. Prior to trial, the latter charge was severed because of its prejudicial effect. At Appellant’s trial for rape, the jury found him guilty and recommended a sentence of twenty years. The trial court entered a judgment consistent with the jury’s recommendation. Appellant appeals to this Court as a matter of right 1 asserting four claims of reversible error: (1) that the trial court erred when it…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Winstead v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Padgett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. David Alan Jenkins v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Grady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API