Legal Opinion

Young v. Continental Crane & Rigging Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 2002No. 9904-04180; A111124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiff in this negligence action arising from plaintiffs lease from defendant of a crane and an operator to install an overhead crane system at a manufacturing plant. While the operator was lifting a box girder with the crane, the girder fell and was damaged. After the trial court ruled that an indemnity provision contained in a “rental agreement” signed by plaintiff was unenforceable, the jury returned a verdict finding plaintiff 49.5 percent negligent and defendant 50.5 percent negligent. The court entered a judgment for plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlas Mutual Insurance v. Moore Dry Kiln Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Seibel v. Layne & Bowler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Duyck v. Northwest Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Anderson v. Ashland Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Northwest Pine Products, Inc. v. Cummins Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archambault v. OgierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Allstates Air Cargo, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Coonrod v. Columbus McKinnon CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API