Legal Opinion
M & M Stone Co. v. Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 28, 2010No. 09-3940PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
M & M Stone Co. (“M & M”) appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing its claims for constitutional and state law violations against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”), the Telford Borough Authority (“TBA”), Spotts Stevens & McCoy, Inc., and the Delaware River Basin Commission (“DRBC”).1 The District Court dismissed *159the claims based on the principles of claim preclusion and issue preclusion.2 For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I. Background
M & M owns and operated a quarry in Telford, Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- GGI Properties, LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- McNeilly v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Grynberg v. Total Compagnie Francaise des PetrolesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Lewis v. GuadagnoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.