Legal Opinion
Farrago v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*632In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered April 2, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Village of Bronxville which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and Arizona Lipnob Estates, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jandru Mats, Inc. v. Riteway AV Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chirco v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pluhar v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Cordova v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Healy v. Village of PatchogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Chirco v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013