Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between Waldron & Goddess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1983Published

1Dissent

Sullivan, J. P., and Ross, J., dissent in a memorandum by Sullivan, J. P., as follows:

This is an appeal from a dismissal of a petition to stay arbitration sought on the ground of lack of an agreement to arbitrate. The underlying dispute between petitioner Robert Waldron and respondent Lynn Goddess, both of whom are real estate brokers employed by Cross & Brown Company, concerns the right to a brokerage commission earned in connection with a lease negotiated through Cross & Brown. Each claims entitlement to the real estate broker’s share of the commission. Both Waldron and Goddess had written…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Jemzura v. JemzuraNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API