Sudler v. Sudler
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Queen Anne’s County. The facts are stated! in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
The question in this case is whether the Orphans’ Court of Queen Anne’s County had jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of Laura L. Beatty. It was decided as early as Compton v. Compton, 2 Gill, 241, that no appeal will lie from an order of the Orphans’ Court appointing a guardian when it has jurisdiction to make the appointment, and Judge Magbudei* said: “The Orphans’ Court, in the discharge of this duty, may make an injudicious choice; hut it is not probable that this Court, without any information to assist them, could exercise such a power more judiciously.” Whether or not the Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allgood v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Lefever v. LefeverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Compton v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
3Cited by18 opinions
- Moreno v. University of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Bjornquist v. Boston & A. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
- Fox v. LasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- White v. BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Metcalf's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.