Legal Opinion

Peter v. Arrien

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 70-1078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOOD, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs have served requests for admissions on defendant who has in turn served written objections to these requests. Plaintiffs are the widow and minor children of Ralph M. Peter who was drowned in an accident occurring during the course of his employment. Defendant is a Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees Compensation Commission.

Plaintiffs brought the instant action pursuant to § 21 of the Longshoremen’s *1349and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 921 to review and set…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Ernest Quick v. George C. Martin, William L. Massey v. George C. Martin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keen v. Detroit Diesel AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Thalheim v. EberheimDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  3. Kosta v. ConnollyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Beker Industries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Brewer v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API