Legal Opinion

Suesskind v. Wilson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1931No. 22537PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The record discloses substantial evidence sustaining the execution of the contract, as claimed by the plaintiff, and that issue as well as the issue presented by the defense of fraud and misrepresentation inducing the contract should have been submitted to the jury, unless the contract is illegal and unenforceable, and that is the only question of law presented by this record.

It is apparent that serious disagreement wMch had arisen between the parties led to a mutual desire for a separation of their interests, which was to he consummated by complete severance by Wilson of his relations with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Preston v. First Bank of MariettaOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. EDM & Associates, Inc. v. GEM CellularDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. New Products Corp. v. City of North MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. City of MiddletownOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API