Evans v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Randall Evans appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it was less safe for him to drive 1 and giving a false report of a crime. 2 He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his DUI conviction and the admission of similar transaction evidence. The challenges are without merit and we thus affirm Evans’ conviction.

1. Evans contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal as to the DUI charge because there is no evidence that he drove the vehicle in question. We…