Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Neely

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1944No. 35632PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

These are two questions here for decision: First, whether or not the provisions of Chapter 3, Yol. 4, Title 22, Sections 5616-5834 inclusive, Code of 1942, regulating insurance companies and prescribing the duties of the Commissioner of Insurance in regard to the examination thereof, were intended by the legislature to abrogate or repeal the common law rig*ht of a stockholder in a domestic insurance company to inspect the books and records of such corporation; second, if such common law right of the stockholder still exists in this state, then does the petition of the appellant, B. D.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Grimes v. Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Duncan v. RudulphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ulmer v. Falmouth Loan & Building Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clark v. Luvel Dairy Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Houston v. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Myers v. City of McCombMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lott v. SaultersMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Nettleton Church of Christ v. ConwillMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API