Legal Opinion

New Mexico Potash & Chemical Co. v. Oliver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1951No. 16244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

228 P.2d 979 (1951)

123 Colo. 208

NEW MEXICO POTASH & CHEMICAL CO., Inc.

v.

OLIVER.

No. 16244.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

February 5, 1951.

Grant, Shafroth & Toll, William Grant, and W. R. Newcomb, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

John F. Mueller, Gregory A. Mueller, and Don B. Oliver, Pro se, all of Denver, for defendant in error.

HAYS, Justice.

This is an action brought by defendant in error against plaintiff in error to recover judgment for services rendered by him as an attorney, pursuant to the terms of a contract of employment, and for an order requiring plaintiff in error to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dick v. PetersenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. New Mexico Potash & Chemical Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. LynemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of King Resources Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  2. Gulick v. A. Robert Strawn & Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Siener v. ZeffColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Lewis v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Commercial Finance Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API