Legal Opinion
RHM Estates v. Hampshire
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 24, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*44OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered July 7, 2003 reversed, without costs, and finad judgment of possession is awarded to petitioner.
Based upon the evidence adduced at trial and in the exercise of our authority to render the judgment warranted by the facts (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]), we conclude that respondent Hampshire’s relationship to the elderly tenant was that of a close friend and roommate not characterized by the requisite “emotional and financial commitment and interdependence” connoting a family relationship…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- GSL Enterprises, Inc. v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Seminole Realty Co. v. GreenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4Cited by1 opinion
- RHM Estates v. HampshireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005