Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D. E.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 19, 2011No. A11A1763PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
D. E. was adjudicated delinquent following a finding that he committed burglary. He contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment.
On appeal, “[t]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.) Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). See also In the Interest ofJ. L. H., 289 Ga. App. 30 (656 SE2d 160) (2007) (same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Moak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Savage v. KGE Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Highsmith v. FillingimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TUGGLE v. ROSE Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- In Re DeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011