Legal Opinion

Kutner-Goldstein Co. v. Workman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1931No. Docket No. 307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In April, 1926, the plaintiff sold to the defendant a new grain binder and engine, which proved defective during the ensuing harvesting season. A new contract was entered into in writing between the parties on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1926, providing for the sale of the binder and engine to the defendant for $515, $104 of which was paid in cash, and the defendant agreed to pay the balance of $411 on June 15, 1927. At the same time the plaintiff signed and delivered to the defendant a letter reading as follows:

“Relative to grain binder, as per contract signed today, this is to advise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spaeth v. Ocean Park Realty Mining & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Haines v. SnedigarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jozovich v. Central California Berry Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Alpern v. Mayfair MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API