Kutner-Goldstein Co. v. Workman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
In April, 1926, the plaintiff sold to the defendant a new grain binder and engine, which proved defective during the ensuing harvesting season. A new contract was entered into in writing between the parties on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1926, providing for the sale of the binder and engine to the defendant for $515, $104 of which was paid in cash, and the defendant agreed to pay the balance of $411 on June 15, 1927. At the same time the plaintiff signed and delivered to the defendant a letter reading as follows:
“Relative to grain binder, as per contract signed today, this is to advise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spaeth v. Ocean Park Realty Mining & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Haines v. SnedigarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jozovich v. Central California Berry Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Alpern v. Mayfair MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953