Legal Opinion

Tate v. Kramer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1892No. 24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Gillespie. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Moursund. Statement is given in opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

The statement of the nature and result of the suit made by plaintiffs in error is correct, and is accepted by the defendants in error. It is as follows:

“ This suit, in form an action of trespass to try title to about 1700 acres of land in G-illespie county, Texas, was brought in the District Court of said county February 10, 1887, by plaintiffs in error against Kramer and Hardt, defendants in error. February 24, 1887, defendants answered by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of not guilty. September 23, 1887, the court granted leave to defendants to make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Richardson v. LeviTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Evans v. TempletonTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Caldwell v. FraimTexas Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Wildflower Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Degenhart v. CartierMontana Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API