Legal Opinion

Erskin Bell v. Geico General Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 14, 2012No. 12-10265UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Erskin Bell, Sr. (Erskin, Sr.) and Phillipa St. Marie-Bell (“Phillipa”) (collectively “the Bells”), as guardians and parents of Erskin Bell, II (“Erskin”), appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee GEICO General Insurance Company’s (“GEICO”) motion for summary judgment and denying the Bells’ motion for partial summary judgment. Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of GEICO.

I. Background

GEICO issued an automobile liability insurance policy to the Bells providing non-stacking…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. DeLaune v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INS. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Garcia v. Public Health Trust of Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mathurin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
  2. Wiseman v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API