Legal Opinion
Hames v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1977No. 49496Published
1Opinion of the Court
571 P.2d 831 (1977)
Linda Kay HAMES, Appellee,
v.
Boyd ANDERSON, Appellant.
No. 49496.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
October 18, 1977.
Rehearing Denied November 30, 1977.
David C. Hood, Oklahoma City, for appellee.
Edward H. Ferrish, Midwest City, for appellant.
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:
Linda Kay Hames (Hames), appellee, brought suit for slander against Boyd Anderson (Anderson), appellant. Hames worked as a professional roller skating instructor at a rink operated by Anderson in Midwest City. On trial to a jury, Hames testified to Anderson orally accusing her of taking some $385 from a drawer at the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- State v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Stone v. EarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.