Wyatt Lumber Supply Company, Inc. v. Hansen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
On August 25, 1938, Otto Hansen entered into a building contract with M. Friedman to remodel the latter’s residence in the city of El Dorado. This contract was upon the consideration of $2,400, to be paid after the completion of the work. Friedman resided in the house to be remodeled, and continued to live in it while the remodeling work was in progress. During the progress of the work Friedman advanced Hansen- $200, but made him no other payment. The contract did not require this payment until the. work was completed. ■
The contract detailed the work to be done, but provided that “The owner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Krogman v. Rice Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Beasley v. HaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Cunningham Lumber Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- McCalley v. OteySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McKendall v. PatulloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Bank of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Christy v. Nabholz Supply Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Coward v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. AuxerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Haingaertner v. Zhejiang Sunshine Leisure Products Co. LTD.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.