Legal Opinion

Faxon Hills Construction Co. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1958No. 35295Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Despite the temptation to do so, it is not necessary to discuss several questions incidentally presented by this record, such as whether under the constitutions of the defendant unions (exhibits 1 and 2) the purpose of the picketing was to get a closed shop, and whether the so-called “no-man’s land” recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U. S., 1, 1 L. Ed. (2d), 601, 77 S. Ct., 598; Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen of North America, Local No. 427, v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc., 353 U. S., 20, 1 L. Ed. (2d), 613, 77 S. Ct., 604; San…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local No. 427 v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Continental Supply Co. v. Fisher Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Jones v. Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API