Legal Opinion

Scott Paper Co. v. National Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-2141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

I must decide whether I should require joinder of, or dismiss for failure to join in this action, three absent parties which the defendant alleges to be necessary and indispensable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 because the absent parties’ interests will be prejudiced if they are not part of this action. After having notice served on the three absent parties soliciting their input on the pending motion, and having received no response to the notice, I now find after considering the practical considerations recommending for and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Rauscher, Richard H. And Griffith, Robert and Griffith, Linda. Appeal of Robert and Linda GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Terra Nova Insurance Company, Ltd. v. 900 Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Special Jet Services, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Kint v. Terrain King Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Scott Paper Co. v. National Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Spring-Ford Area School Dist. v. Genesis Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Bieros v. NicolaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API