Legal Opinion

McFarland v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 2, 1945No. 8959PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of murder in. the commission of rape and was sentenced, to death. The evidence, which we shall not recite, clearly established his guilt. He was-ably defended and his counsel have left no stone unturned on this appeal. We have carefully considered all the points which counsel raise. We find no prejudicial: error.

Blood was discovered on appellant’s body after the crime, by an examination to which appellant, an enlisted man,, submitted under a military order. Though: the court ruled out this evidence and instructed the jury to disregard it, the jury had heard something…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bratcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. Shaffer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. Paul Michael MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Charles E. Blackford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Alfred Dallago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API