Harris v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
This is an appeal from a post-conviction proceeding involving the competency of legal counsel in a rape case.
I
Upon a prior appeal from the conviction itself, the defendant contended that his former counsel was so incompetent as trial attorney as to be “inherently ineffective’’ in his representation of the defendant; that, therefore, he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in violation of his constitutional rights.
This Court declined to rule upon the issue being raised for the first time upon the direct appeal. After specifying the charges and delineating the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Albury v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Montgomery Cellular Holding Co. v. DoblerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Chavous v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.