Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Brill

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 16, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrince, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, an attorney at law, for legal services rendered to the defendant’s wife, at her request, at a time when defendant and his wife were living separate and apart. Defendant is being sued on the ground that said services are necessaries.

Defendant’s wife retained the plaintiff to bring an action of separation against the defendant, her husband. The plaintiff had several conferences with the defendant’s wife, reduced to writing and gave consideration to various lengthy statements from her regarding her relations with her husband, and prepared a number of papers in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Naumer v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Langbein v. SchneiderUnited States District Court · 1891
  3. Hays v. LedmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. McQuhae v. ReyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1893
  5. Jackson v. FreyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Martin Steingesser, Bankrupt. Diana D. Dubroff v. Martin SteingesserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Levine v. LevineCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  3. Cardozo v. GulackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API