Legal Opinion

In re McCall

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1996No. Bankruptcy No. 94-10128 SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the trial on the merits of the Objection to Confirmation of Plan and Motion to Dismiss, filed by First USA Bank on February 22, 1996. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 1334. *174This is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) as exemplified by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

The creditor First USA Bank (“bank”) objects to confirmation of the plan on the grounds that it is receiving insufficient payment under the plan and that the plan is filed in bad faith.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re Gregory A. Lemaire, Debtor. Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. LemaireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Groves v. LaBarge (In re Groves)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re McCallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API