Legal Opinion
The Horn & Hardart Company v. The Pillsbury Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 1989No. 12, Docket 89-7212PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
The central question presented by this appeal is to what extent, if any, parol evidence may be employed to connect signed and unsigned writings to satisfy the New York Statute of Frauds, N.Y.U.C.C. § 1-206(1) (McKinney 1964) (“Statute of Frauds”). Plaintiff-appellant Horn & Har-dart Company (“Horn & Hardart”) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Whitman Knapp, Judge) granting defendant-appellee Pillsbury Company’s (“Pillsbury”) motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). Horn & Hardart Co.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Schonberger v. SerchukDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.