People v. Hanson
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride
In this case, the primary issue we are asked to decide is whether the grant of a defense motion for a psychological examination, without more, creates a sufficient inference that the trial court found bona fide doubt of defendant’s fitness to stand trial to require a remand for a retrospective fitness hearing. We hold that it does not.
BACKGROUND
In 2001, defendant Robert Hanson was indicted on charges of aggravated battery (720 ILCS 5/12 — 4(b)(6) (West 2000)) and resisting a peace officer (720 ILCS 5/31 — 1(a) (West 2000)). Defense counsel filed a written pretrial motion, citing section 104 —…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. EddmondsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. HaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. WoodardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. SkillomAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- People v. McCullumAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.