Legal Opinion

People v. Hanson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2004No. 96869PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

In this case, the primary issue we are asked to decide is whether the grant of a defense motion for a psychological examination, without more, creates a sufficient inference that the trial court found bona fide doubt of defendant’s fitness to stand trial to require a remand for a retrospective fitness hearing. We hold that it does not.

BACKGROUND

In 2001, defendant Robert Hanson was indicted on charges of aggravated battery (720 ILCS 5/12 — 4(b)(6) (West 2000)) and resisting a peace officer (720 ILCS 5/31 — 1(a) (West 2000)). Defense counsel filed a written pretrial motion, citing section 104 —…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. EddmondsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. HaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. WoodardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. SkillomAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. People v. McCullumAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API