Legal Opinion
Miranda v. Blair Tool & Machine Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 18, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Levine, J.), dated September 12, 1984, which granted third-party defendant Osrow Products, Inc.’s motion for a protective order and denied, as moot, plaintiff’s cross motion for an order compelling disclosure.
Order reversed, with costs, motion for a protective order denied, cross motion to compel disclosure granted, and respondent’s time to comply with plaintiff’s notice for discovery and inspection is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Pataki v. KisedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Matos v. Akram & Jamal Meat Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Viruet v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Goldstein v. News York Daily NewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crazytown Furniture, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Chakmakjian v. NYRAC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Merrick v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Vivitorian Corp. v. First Central InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Snyder v. WinterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.