Legal Opinion

In re Paakiki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint for Malpractice.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

The respondent,’Z. Paakiki, an attorney of the Lower Courts, was cited at the May Term, 1892, of the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit, to show cause why he should not be disbarred. On motion of respondent, the Deputy Attorney-General and the Court consenting, the matter was brought to the Supreme Court, and was heard during the July Term by Chief Justice Judd and Mr. Justice Bickerton, Mr. Justice Dole being Unable to sit, he holding the Term, but, having read the testimony, joins in the decision.

The charge against the respondent is in substance as…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re FrenchHawaii Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API