Green v. Norton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
There was verdict and judgment for defendant in this action of malicious prosecution, and plaintiff appeals.
The assignments of error relate to a few questions as to evidence, and the refusal of charge 1, requested by the plaintiff. Under the view here entertained, they need no separate treatment for the reason the conclusion has been reached that defendant was, upon the undisputed proof, due to be given in his behalf the affirmative charge duly requested. Approvingly quoted in Molton Realty Co. v. Murchison, 212 Ala. 561, 103 So. 651, 652, is the following from 2 Thompson’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Gulsby v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Molton Realty Co. v. MurchisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Key v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Huffstutler v. EdgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Rhyne v. H & B MOTORSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Schwabacher v. HerringAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.