United States v. Wealth and Tax Advisory Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We hold today that a 29-page “draft opinion letter” sent by the taxpayers’ ac countants to the taxpayers’ tax lawyers, containing extensive legal authority and analysis of a complicated tax transaction, constitutes a “memorandum.” Therefore, even though the letter was characterized as a “draft,” it was nevertheless subject to disclosure pursuant to the taxpayers’ agreement to provide to the IRS “[a]ll opinions and memoranda that provide a legal analysis” of the transaction in question.
The United States appeals from the district court’s order denying the government’s petition to enforce a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Atari Corp. v. Ernst & WhinneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. Worrell Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. Allendale Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Patterson v. BeardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Austin v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4808 (or.tax 10-20-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009
- Poore v. Simpson Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Poore v. Simpson Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Poore v. Simpson Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008