Legal Opinion

Hardman Lumber Co. v. Blanch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1920No. 22,568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Graham district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

' The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants W. F. Conner and Emma S. Conner on an objection to the introduction of evidence under the amended petition of the plaintiff, and it appeals.

For building material sold to a subcontractor to be used in erecting, altering, and repairing a dwelling house on lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, in block 2 of Sanford and Crawford’s addition to Hill City, the plaintiff claimed a mechanic’s lien on all that property and filed a lien…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Mulvane v. Chicago Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Lehmer v. HortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Logan-Moore Lumber Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Cooke v. LuscombeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Badger Lumber & Coal Co. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Golden Belt Lumber Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Thomasson v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API