Maury v. Toledo Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent as garnishor against appellant as garnishee defendant, upon a controverted answer of the garnishee defendant, tried by the court.
On October 25,1927, respondent recovered judgment against the principal defendant, Toledo Logging Company, a corporation, in the sum of $5,556; the judgment remained wholly unpaid and unsatisfied except that, by application of the sum of $916.33 previously recovered by garnishment against the same garnishee defendant on October 19, 1926, the balance left due arid unpaid was $1,639.67, with interest thereon…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Old National Bank v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Edward L. Eyre & Co. v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Schnitger v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. ParthumArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- First National Bank in Plant City v. McJunkin Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.