Legal Opinion

Poncin v. Arlt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 6, 1988No. CX-88-55Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Presiding Judge.

Edward Poncin sued Bruce Arlt, Independent School District No. 508, Thor Tolo and the St. Peter Herald for libel when Arlt allegedly told Tolo that Poncin had cheated in a high school tennis match. A jury determined Arlt’s statement to Tolo was true and the alleged libelous statement was made without actual malice. We affirm.

FACTS

In a standard dual tennis meet under the Minnesota high school rules, each coach is required to rank and play the team’s best player in the number one position and the. team’s second best player in the number two position, etc.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star and Tribune Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Tawney v. Simonson, Whitcomb & Hurley Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Cotroneo v. PilneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API