Legal Opinion
Stumpff v. Second Injury Fund of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREASEN, Justice.
The sole issue raised on appeal is whether James C. Stumpff suffered a qualifying first injury for the purpose of invoking Second Injury Fund liability. The deputy industrial commissioner, the industrial commissioner, and the district court found Stumpff had not suffered a qualifying first injury. We agree. The district court’s ruling is affirmed.
I.Background.
Twenty-one-year-old James C. Stumpff was injured on October 6, 1976 when his right hand was caught in the chute of a cement truck. He suffered a severe fracture at the distal aspect of the proximal phalanx. No other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. BradenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. BergesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Simbro v. Delong's SportswearSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Myers v. F.C.A. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Ewing v. Allied Construction ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department And Travelers Insurance Company Vs. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.