Legal Opinion

Homœopathic Mutual Life Insurance v. Marshall

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill to foreclose. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage for $4,000 and interest, dated January 25th, 1874, given by Igene M. Marrenner and her husband to the complainant, on land belonging to Mrs. Marrenner, situate in the city of Elizabeth. Just before her marriage to her present husband, Mrs. Marrenner (who was then a widow) executed a deed, dated November 1st, 1878, conveying the mortgaged premises and another lot of land on the opposite side of the same street, to her father, Daniel D. T. Marshall, in trust for her use for life, and, at her death, to convey the premises thereby granted…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co. v. WarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Hartley v. FroshTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Kane v. McCownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Lacey v. Davis & McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson Trust Co. v. GilkinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Lesser v. StrubbeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Mitschele-Baer v. Livingston SandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Bruck v. the Credit CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API