Legal Opinion

Filley v. Cody

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to District Court of Gilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.

The defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the writ on the ground that no bond for costs has been filed as required by section 1, chapter XIX of the Revised Statutes.

The motion is supported by an affidavit setting up that the plaintiff in error was a non-resident when the writ was sued out. This is not sought to be controverted by counter affidavits.

The statute declares in mandatory terms that if any action shall be commenced without filing a cost bond, the court on motion shall dismiss the same. The language is unequivocal, and leaves nothing to the discretion of the court. Western…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Naderhoff v. Geo. Benz & SonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kiesel v. District Court of Sixth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Sevier CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Edgar Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Ohio-Colorado Mining & Milling Co. v. ElderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Sutro v. SimpsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API