Legal Opinion
Smith-Bey v. Petsock
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 23, 1984No. 83-5825PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
741 F.2d 22
Robert SMITH-BEY, Appellant,
v.
George PETSOCK, Superintendent, Thomas Seiverling, Complaint
Officer, Robert Coward, Mail Department Official, Anthony
Pace, Business Manager, Sergeant Markovich, Erskind Deramus,
Deputy Commissioner, and Ronald J. Marks, Commissioner.
No. 83-5825.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6)
May 14, 1984.
Decided Aug. 23, 1984.
Robert Smith-Bey, pro se.
LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., Allen C. Warshaw, Andrew S. Gordon, Sr. Deputy Attys. Gen., Sheila M. Ford, Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., for appellees.
Before…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramazan Sahin v. Brian Emig, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026