Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Matthews

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

An action for separation was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant who was a resident of New Jersey. No service having been made upon him an order was obtained ex parte under section 1171-a of the Civil Practice Act sequestrating his property within the State and directing the payment from it of counsel fees and alimony. We held the proceeding was in the nature of an attachment. Property of a defendant resident or non-resident, upon whom personal service could not be made within the State, might be seized and held subject to further disposition by the court. But as in the case of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Geary v. GearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Bray v. LandergrenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. In re RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API