Legal Opinion

In re Filer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee allowing the claim of Kohn & Co.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

I have carefully examined the authorities cited in opposition to the claim of Kohn & Co., in the seventh paragraph, and do not think them applicable. I am of the opinion that the referee’s ruling was correct, on the ground that Kohn & Co. had the right to treat the bankrupt as the principal in the purchase of stocks which he had induced them to purchase under false and fictitious orders. The bankrupt was in fact the real principal. There was no other. The purchases were by his order, and were intended to be for his benefit; and, on such facts, he would be estopped to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perin v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Perin v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re J. M. Mertens & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  2. In re United Button Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1906
  3. United States v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  4. Reinhardt v. FriederichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API