Legal Opinion

Kilty v. Michael

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1921No. 23,468PublishedCited by 9 opinions

' From Huntington Circuit Court; Nelson G. Hunter, Special Judge. Drainage proceeding on the petition of William Michael. From the judgment rendered, Andrew Kilty and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

— In 1895 the John Young drain was established and constructed, commencing near the center of the southwest quarter of section 26, township 29 north, range 8 east, in Huntington county, Indiana, and extending southeastwardly across that section and across sections 35 and 36, a distance of 10,380 feet, and terminating at a highway on the south boundary of sec*376tion 36, which was also the south boundary of the farm now owned by appellee. From this point the ground sloped toward the southeast, and the water ran along a channel worn by its action to an open ditch a quarter of a mile away. But no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huffman v. NewleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Roundenbush v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Widmer v. SWEENEYIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Higgins v. SwygmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Indiana Department of Conservation v. Pulaski Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Wilks v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API