Legal Opinion

Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. Bruhlmeyer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1938No. 13795Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing..

Appellees contend that they have shown a probable right of recovery of an undivided one-half of the minerals in and under the lands in controversy, and that such interest is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured, and that, therefore, they are entitled to the appointment of a receiver to take over the management and control of the entire property and the operation of the oil wells drilled thereon by the lessees of the owner of the surface and, admittedly, the owner of one-half of such minerals.

In the motion for rehearing, complaint is made of this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hardy Oil Company v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
  3. Davis v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. West v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Kokernot v. RoosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API