Legal Opinion

Schober v. Schober

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1984No. S-265PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BURKE, C.J., and RABINOW-ITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. BURKE, Chief Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether unused personal leave, which may be used or converted to cash by the person accruing it, is a marital asset for purposes of the court’s division of the parties’ property in an action for divorce. We hold that such leave is marital property and that the superior court erred in refusing to treat it as such in the case at bar.

I

Wayne and Robyn Schober were divorced in 1983. At the time of the divorce Mr. Schober, an Alaska State Trooper, was owed over 400 hours of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Monsma v. MonsmaAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Mann v. MannAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In re the Marriage of CardonaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. Pasley v. PasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API