Cook, Perkiss & Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Cook, Perkiss & Liehe appeals the decision of a United States Magistrate acting pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) granting appellees’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for false advertising under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). We agree with the magistrate that Cook’s complaint does not state a claim for relief under the Lanham Act because, as a matter of law, the alleged misrepresentations contained in the appellees’ advertisement are merely “puffery.” We therefore affirm the magistrate’s judgment dismissing the Lanham Act claim and dismissing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Preston Guillory, Frank Ritter, and Ty Ritter v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Truck Components, Inc. v. K-H Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Laitram Machinery, Inc. v. Carnitech A/SDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1995
- United States v. Idaho Falls Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1999
- Keller Medical Specialties Products v. Armstrong Medical Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.