Legal Opinion
Richard Gauthier v. Amf, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 1986No. 85-3750PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed April 29, 1986, published at 788 F.2d 634, is amended as follows:
At page 636, delete the second paragraph under Part B, and substitute the following:
The record shows that the trial court admitted evidence of subsequent remedial changes by the entire industry, including AMF. For example, during cross-examination, AMF’s design engineer, Donald Amis, was specifically asked about AMF’s subsequent design changes concerning the method of operating the clutch and the use of deadman blade stops. In addition, plaintiff’s expert, John Sevart, testified to subsequent remedial changes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxygen Company, Inc. And Sherwood-Selpac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Richard GAUTHIER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMF, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by35 opinions
- Karen Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Department City of Los Angeles James J. King Stanley A. SchottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Elizabeth v. Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. And Daimler-Benz North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Raymond v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.