Commonwealth v. Hartfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Gants, C J.
The primary issue on appeal is whether the admission in evidence at a probation violation hearing of hearsay statements of an alleged victim regarding a new criminal offense bars the probationer from calling the alleged victim to testify. We conclude that it does not. Because the judge erred in concluding that it was inherently inconsistent to allow the alleged victim to be called to testify by the probationer after her hearsay statements were admitted in evidence when offered by the probation department, and because the error was constitutional in nature and not harmless beyond a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. PattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. MolinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.