Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Harris

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-3173PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

Before the court is an application for attorney’s fees from counsel for plaintiff in an action in which plaintiff successfully challenged the decisions of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (the “Secretary”) denying her claim for disability benefits and supplemental income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.

The fee petition is brought under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (hereinafter “EAJA” or the “Act”). 1 Section 2412(d)(1)(A) reads:

Except as otherwise specifically provided…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Berman v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Ocasio v. SchweikerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Wolverton v. SchweikerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Wallis D. CORNELLA, Appellant, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Watford v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and AccessoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Baker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  5. Daniel J. Miller, Jr. v. United States of America and Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API