Legal Opinion
Southwick v. Southwick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1995No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In its award of retroactive child support, Supreme Court should have granted defendant a credit for a portion of his payment of expenses associated with the marital residence and his voluntary payments to plaintiff (see generally, Bara v Bara, 130 AD2d 613; Yecies v Yecies, 108 AD2d 813; Neumark v Neumark, 97 AD2d 537). By order dated July 7, 1988, the court directed defendant to pay the following expenses associated with the marital residence: "realty taxes, water…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yecies v. YeciesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Bara v. BaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Neumark v. NeumarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Belkhir v. Amrane-BelkhirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lueker v. LuekerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Grossman v. Merke-GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Belkhir v. Amrane-BelkhirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.