Legal Opinion

Himmelfarb v. Horwitz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge,

Retired:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying summarily the plaintiffs’ and defendant Morton Himmelfarb’s dual motions for a final declaratory judgment. The plaintiffs, in their capacity as trustees of the trust at issue here, had sought a declaratory judgment invalidating a provision of the trust which made the beneficiaries’ entitlement to a share of trust income or corpus contingent on whether they “shall have married or be married to any person not of the Jewish faith or religion.” Defendant Morton Him-melfarb, a person within the class of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. McIntosh v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Kaplan v. PointerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Industrial Nat. Bank of RI v. Rhode Island HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rearden v. Riggs National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API