Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Moore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 1993No. 3-92-0938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

This is an action for dissolution of marriage in which the defendant, Jack Moore (husband), was given two options under his pension plan. First, he could choose not to elect a survivor’s annuity and receive his full pension benefit; second, he could elect a survivor’s annuity, and his pension would be reduced to fund the annuity. The trial court ordered the husband to choose the second option, and he appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this cause for further proceedings.

The husband is a postal worker who has a vested pension benefit. The parties stipulated to most property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Sang LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of HagshenasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. In Re Marriage of MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Marriage of HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API