In Re Marriage of Moore
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton
This is an action for dissolution of marriage in which the defendant, Jack Moore (husband), was given two options under his pension plan. First, he could choose not to elect a survivor’s annuity and receive his full pension benefit; second, he could elect a survivor’s annuity, and his pension would be reduced to fund the annuity. The trial court ordered the husband to choose the second option, and he appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this cause for further proceedings.
The husband is a postal worker who has a vested pension benefit. The parties stipulated to most property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of Sang LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- In Re Marriage of HagshenasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- In Re Marriage of MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Marriage of HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2000